As I mentioned in a LinkedIn post last week, this week’s Energy Rant involves an interesting article Why Homeowners Don’t Trust Energy Efficiency. The paper could also be tweaked a little and re-entitled, Why Customers Don’t Trust Energy Efficiency. Period. As usual, this brings to mind a cornucopia of spinoffs. Let’s first begin with a core theme of a rant from about a month ago. In that, I said savings from current portfolios across the country are dominated by: Incentives for trinkets like CFLs and ENERGY STAR this, that, and the other (consumer goods) and Incentives for contractors to upsell efficient…
Read More
It can be assumed that energy is wasted in nearly all large industrial facilities. Due to the inherent nature of the operating systems, much of the wasted energy cannot be harnessed no matter how hard one tries.
Read More
Last week, some colleagues and I attended the International Energy Program Evaluation Conference (IEPEC) in Chicago. The conference was great with my favorite part: meeting people, getting to know them better, and building friendships. Session content, as usual, spawned a theme in my mind. This year’s theme: This business is crazy. There are panel discussions of experts, you know, the thought leaders with 30+ years of experience in the business, and as I sat there listening, I thought to myself, “Isn’t this a rerun of something I attended in 2011 in Boston, and in 2009 in Portland, and in 2007…
Read More
Michaels Energy Named a 2013 Hot Firm La Crosse, WI - August 15, 2013 - Michaels Energy was named a "Hot Firm" on The Zweig Letter Hot Firm List for the second year in a row. The Zweig Letter 2013 Hot Firm List recognizes the 100 fastest-growing architecture, engineering, planning and environmental consulting firms in the United States and Canada - an industry of over 100,000 firms. These firms have outperformed the economy and competitors to become leaders in their chosen fields. "We're pleased to have received this award for the second year in a row," said Michaels President, Dave…
Read More
This week’s rant is brought to you by Ryan Kroll, Michaels’ Program Evaluation Manager. Last week Ryan issued a Program Brief discussing 90/10 confidence and precision sampling that is the industry norm for energy efficiency program impact evaluation. The 90/10 simply means the results of the sampled projects have a 90% probability of being within plus or minus 10% of properly representing the entire population – and NOT necessarily the right answer. Sample representation and the right answer are obviously different things. Here is the perversion in impact evaluation that I’ve never seen written anywhere: The less you learn about…
Read More
What does confidence and precision levels mean? Most people will say that 90% confidence is needed to be sure that the results of the evaluation are within 10% of the “real” savings. Is this really the case?
Read More
The term “thought leader” is, as “paradigm shift” was at one point, the buzzword of the day. But thought leaders are not paradigm shifters. To demonstrate, this article in Forbes defining thought leaders, does not include the word, or variation of the word entrepreneur; a para dig em creator. Using the article’s description, which happens to align with my caricature of a thought leader, I arrive at this simpleton definition:Noun Thought Leader (thot lee-dur) 1. Best-practice Yoda and Grand Master Jedi energy nerd Defined another way, thought leaders are geniuses at what is – not to be confounded with Bill…
Read More