I’ve corralled a mishmash of rather preposterous short stories for the year end rant. This will be historic so be sure to pass it on to your enemies.
Case 1 comes from Engineered Systems Magazine or ES Magazine. I was catching up on my stack of trade magazines over Christmas weekend (is this sick or what? – but it can be about as entertaining as National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation). September’s “Case in Point” features an energy-saving project for Bangor Maine’s Discovery Museum, delivered by Honeywell. An audit was followed by implementation of cost-effective measures. The audit was completed in 2008 using the “Field Automation Service Technology” tool (FAST – I love acronyms – this is for real, theirs). Findings included the not-so-unusual deferred maintenance like plugged air filters and heating/cooling coils among some more capital-intensive measures apparently.
One of the measures was to install a dual fuel boiler burner to take advantage of cheap natural gas as opposed to $3 fuel oil. The results “dramatically impacted the museum’s bottom line”. The museum paid $2,732 for fuel oil in March 2007 and only $39 in March 2008. Well gaaaauuuullly! (1) fuel oil is stored in tanks on site so you can spend money on fuel when and how you want and (2) they switched from using fuel oil to natural gas. To ensure the savings persist, Honeywell was generous enough to throw in three years of service contract to maintain fresh filters. So what were the real savings??
Case 2 begins with the opinion guys from The Wall Street Journal noting that the EPA is regulating the bejesus out of heavy industry, and in particular the utility industry. This is to start in earnest after the first of the year, with EPA chief Lisa Jackson leading the way.
Starting in the midst of several salvos, the WSJ says utilities are being “forced to choose between continuing to operate and facing major capital expenditures to meet the increasingly strict burden[s], or else shutting down and building replacements [power plants] that use more expensive sources like natural gas. Either way, the costs will be passed through to business and consumers as higher rates, which is the same as a tax increase.” My major problem with this is the usual case of government making things more expensive for the private sector, and guess who takes the beating? It won’t be the government.
But even more bizarre and fishy smelling is a bunch of utility CEOs cheering on the EPA in a letter published in response to the Journal’s rant – like this will be good for their business. They say that “Contrary to the claims that the EPA’s agenda will have negative economic consequences, our companies’ experience complying with air quality regulations demonstrates that regulations can yield important economic benefits, including job creation, while maintaining reliability.” And throwing rocks through windows stimulates the economy and makes for carpenter and window factory jobs too. This doesn’t pass the laugh test.
In the latest shot, the Journal points out the agenda driving the do-gooders – higher prices driven by other utilities as noted above, but the higher expenses don’t apply to certain utilities that are heavy in nukes. This makes perfect sense.
A strong word of advice for these CEOs: play with the devil (U.S. Government) and you WILL get burned by command and control coming from Washington. It’s only a matter of time before you will be looking down the long barrel yourselves.
Case 3, just in time for the warmer weather, airport snow removal by heated pavement! OMG! Of all the insane ideas, including air conditioning in 19 soccer stadiums in Qatar, manmade islands in Abu Dhabi and indoor ski slopes and ice rinks in the Marina Mall, this one tops them all. Calculating the heat loss would melt a mortal Hewlet Packard RPN calculator. Larger airports in cold climates, like MSP and ORD would require a small star (like our sun) to keep the concrete above freezing in worst-case weather. And per my crude calculations, ORD has roughly 14 miles of runway that would take roughly a half million cubic yards of concrete alone (this is from me, a civil engineering / aviation zero). This doesn’t include tarmacs or the infrastructure like underground rivers of antifreeze required for heating. And just think of the disruption.
This is a really bad joke for an idea. Intervention by someone with a brain may be required. This comes from people who throw the number “trillion” around like it equals 10 million. I forget where/who I was listening to but they didn’t use the word “trillion”. They used “thousand billion” in it’s place – much more effective.
written by Jeffrey L. Ihnen, P.E., LEED AP
If you’ve been a regular reader of this blog you must have disagreed with something or maybe more strongly taken exception or offense to something. In this week’s post, maybe I can pick up everyone else.
Christmases were great when I was kid. It was by far my favorite holiday. I couldn’t wait for my mom to put up the same crappy artificial tree every year. It consisted of a broomstick like trunk with holes drilled to support the “branches”. The branches consisted of twisted No. 9 wire with plastic pine needles that I guess may be best described as like bristles in a brush. The ends had a cluster of bristles. The branches and twigs looked like spiral pipe cleaners.
“It’s like martinis. A couple at a time is perfect. Twenty is a little messy and painful.”
We were able to pile enough tinsel rope and ornaments on it to make it look respectable. In a way it was better than most trees, real or fake because we had lots of one-off ornaments made by us kids, or given as gifts for this or that. There were almost no box collections of glass balls, which typically broke one by one as we played football on our knees in the living room. My knees burn and back hurts just thinking about it. This was the football version of Nerf basketball. Somebody would inevitably get tackled into the tree sending ornaments flying. It wasn’t a good time until something broke or mom came tromping in with the wooden spoon.
Well that burned off as the years passed and the holiday break just became an over-welcome break from school and time to play holiday basketball tournaments in high school. In college I had a chance to get together with friends for more robust celebration. Now as an old man, it’s a nice break to get a reprieve from email and fire fighting and a time to catch up and actually take a couple days off for real. The only downside is we have to drive to my mom’s with a house full of siblings, their kids and extended family. It isn’t as though I don’t like people in my family. I just don’t like being trapped in a relatively small house with all of them at once. It’s like martinis. A couple at a time is perfect. Twenty is a little messy and painful. But this is the greatest thing in the world for Mom so it’s worth it.
We get a Christmas tree for our office every year. At one point the clean up crew got fed up with the needles so we converted to a fake tree. Now we’re back to real trees probably because we now have a hardwood floor rather than crappy carpet, so cleanup’s a breeze, I think.
This year our tree arrived and I thought, wow what a spectacular tree. I spend many hours, many, many hours trying to grow trees like that on my wooded lot. Growing trees on my lot is like fish fry making it to spawning age. Only about 2% of them make it without getting mowed off by 100 pound rodents others call whitetail deer. I have a hell of a time getting the trees above munching height. It’s difficult to grow tall trees when they get munched off every year. An electric fence and individual fence barriers are installed for protection. I’m sure my neighbors think I’m a whack job but we know them quite well and they know I don’t have horns and a pointy tail.
Then once trees get above munching height they become targets for the damn bucks that do their antler scraping on them and in probably two minutes they can destroy a beautiful 5 year old tree. I usually refer to hunting as killing defenseless animals, per my former boss’s definition, but at my house it’s pest eradication. When I was a kid I hunted all the time for everything that was fair game, but now I beg my neighbor to eradicate the varmints but he’s too sportsman like – too much of a hunter. It has to be a clean shot, the right size varmint, the right gender and all that kind of crap. Just take them out. I’ll pay the butcher.
So at Christmastime people are out chopping down perfect trees that I’m trying to grow. Our office tree like most others is blocking views to outdoors in our office and lights are deployed up the wazoo. It (was) surrounded by many frivolous gifts wrapped in goofy wrapping paper or fancy bags that when burned only are half consumed as the rest is some combination of non-combustible clay and other paint residue (not that I’ve tried this). All this flies in the face of LEED and sustainability.
For the office Christmas party, we are encouraged to get $10-15 gifts for a random gift exchange. Guys this is the rule: 12-packs of damn good beer only.
So my green solution is this: Chip in for a reusable keg (otherwise known as half barrels in this goofy state) of damn good beer. We drink our limit of 24 ounces with our reusable glasses (real glass ones). Use one of the potted plants for the Christmas tree. At my house, we use our fig tree and in fact, I liked it so much last year, we left the lights (LED of course) installed all year. The lights are on a timer. The wrapping paper for the keg can be one reusable bow used annually. We don’t need no stinking wrapping paper. The women can either partake in the beer consumption, get a box of wine or even a barrel, or a bulk tank of floral hand lotion. Whatever it takes; just no cluttery knickknacks.
The tree growers can bring their skills to my house. I would gladly pay $30-$50 a pop for these perfect trees that are currently being massacred and I’m not talking about buying the big trees. Plant seedlings and tend them until they get above munching and scraping size.
Now that my friends, is a sustainable Christmas.
After our tree was installed in the office this year, I asked where are the candy canes? Get some candy canes so I can get my sugar fix. So Deb, our receptionist kindly populated the tree with candy canes. I ask, why can’t somebody patent a candy cane wrapper that is easy to remove. Getting the wrapper off a candy cane is like skinning a frozen earth worm. After a while of biting and clawing at it, just eat the whole thing. Same thing goes for compact disc wrappers. Good grief, what is it about these things? It says lift here but that peels off a tiny sliver of super sticky tape. So you have to work for five minutes to get the thing open. Think of the lost GDP.
written by Jeffrey L. Ihnen, P.E., LEED AP
I just finished plowing out after probably a foot of snow fell over about 18 hours Saturday afternoon into the wee hours of Sunday morning. My wife suggested I go blow out the neighbor’s driveway. He’s had heart problems but he does have a blower so I said give them a call to see if it’s ok because if somebody blew my driveway out I’d be pissed. It would be like watching somebody else reel in my trophy fish for me – especially with the virtually unstoppable John Deere at my fingertips. A few years ago, I first added a couple suitcase weights. Last year I added two more and finally broke down and got chains. With the wheel weights, it probably has close to 400 lbs for added traction but there’s room for one more suitcase weight and I could fill the tires with fluid – probably not necessary!
Anyway, I was thinking once again that as of Thursday, the forecast for this weather system that dumped a foot on us was for “snow showers”. I don’t know what a snow shower is but it doesn’t bring to mind belly-deep snow for our Labrador Retrievers. Two days before we got hit with an awesome storm and a foot of snow, the forecast was “snow showers”. Other times the forecast is for six to eight inches and we get flurries instead. (Flurries incidentally are snowflakes that only exist in the air or in your mind in which case you would be a Parmenidean airhead) Anyone living in the Midwest away from areas susceptible to lake-effect snow has experienced this grossly erroneous forecasting at least a dozen times a year.
We have what, 70, maybe 80 years of practice forecasting weather? It’s essentially a two-dimensional turbulence problem over this short two-day term. Thousands of people, including the almighty federal government, have spent their entire lives “learning” to predict weather, now with the most powerful computers known to the human race. Yet they still hit this forecast so poorly that if it were a golf shot, it wouldn’t even be a worm killer. The ball wouldn’t make it off the tee box. The forced draft of the club head would be just enough to knock the ball off the tee. Foink.
So I ask, isn’t a little bit or completely naïve, ignorant, pompous or something to think computer models can predict the earth’s temperature over the long term? Beyond the relatively simple two-dimensional weather model, the global temperature model would have only about 8,000 additional variables, some huge ones like turbulence in the oceans which are giant heat sinks, (and I mean giant and they spin tangentially and vertically relative to the earth’s surface) the heat source’s (sun’s) output variance, volcanoes spewing grit and CO2 shutting down continental air traffic for weeks, and I could list at least 500 additional ones but don’t want to bore you further.
Or take the relatively simple subject of economics. Projecting what will happen next in the economy may be easier than predicting the weather. Still, nobody has come close. One guy says we can never forecast the economy with any accuracy. I think he should try modeling the planet.
It isn’t a question of whether CO2 affects global temperatures. It does, (as do cucumbers) all else equal, but does it match a single eruption? I would say anyone who emphatically says it does should try their graces at forecasting the weather a while. Even if we could predict with 99% accuracy (whatever that means) what the weather will be one week from today, it would be the equivalent of first grade flash cards compared to Ph.D. level computational fluid dynamics that would be the global model. But even that would be oversimplification because sooner or later the first grader can learn CFD.
Further comparing weather forecasting to climate modeling, with weather forecasting we have instant and absolutely positive feedback in a very short period of time – an instant comparatively. Modelers examine what may have went wrong with their model such that it predicted snow showers and the next thing you know, the Vikings with their new coach and geriatric quarterback are playing in Detroit – as their home field against the NY Giants. The parameters are few. The outcome variance is huge and the feedback is instant. The lessons learned should fill the library of congress, yet in 80 years (whatever) we still can’t even predict the weather a couple days out.
I don’t pretend to know the answer. I know enough via academic background and experience, and the obvious, that I, nor can anyone else project future climate patterns with any sort of certainty. Or, as Rummy once eloquently said, “Reports that say something hasn’t happened are interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know.”
This guy is bringing a class action lawsuit against the USGBC because he isn’t participating in LEED and he thinks LEED is a farce giving others an unfair advantage. I didn’t see anyone else in the class. It must be him and the mouse in his pocket.
This is entirely unproductive and as I suggested just a couple weeks ago in Feral Cat, What Say You, if he goes after USGBC, why not go after ASHRAE and all the state reviewers of code compliance. Rather than getting on board and getting involved tear it down. This scorched earth does no good for anyone, the plaintiff in this case as well. It is the opposite of the way we choose to do business.
Secondly, PC Magazine published an article reporting that Pike Research completed a study indicating cloud computing would reduce worldwide data center energy expenditures by 38% in the next few years. Back in April in my rant about Greenpeace,I confessed to being ignorant with respect to IT but I put my credibility on the line essentially betting cloud computing would save energy. Touché.
written by Jeffrey L. Ihnen, P.E., LEED AP
Hide the kids. The DOE has spawned an energy and renewable advisory committee. You know, a diversified products / technology manufacturer like 3M or DuPont should examine the Byzantine labyrinth of government agencies as a model to develop the next bullet, explosion, radiation, fire, water, and bio proof wonder material. I have to believe that if they could weave sewing thread or maybe two pound monofilament fishing line into such a fabric it would stop a 40 caliber projectile at point blank and not even cause a contusion.
Why does the country need this? Why does the country need a debt commission for that matter? We have a full time congress for goodness sake. Isn’t that what they are supposed to be doing? I suppose this is this too much to ask of 535 FULL TIME bureaucrats?
As anyone who knows anything would guess, the committee is dominated by academics and government wonks, although at least there is one utility guy on there. Therefore, I am sure we will have a cornucopia of far out recommendations from a distant galaxy. Most likely it will be heavy on far out technology and more spectacular policies like 15% or is it 20% ethanol blends for gasoline. Maybe they can mandate its use, block imports, subsidize it with our money, steal our watch and tell us what time it is too.
Do these people or anyone at the DOE realize there is an industry of private sector product and service providers that work on our home planet of Earth with end users (also home-based on Earth)? We are constrained to pesky things such as the laws of nature and economics and consumer whims. I’ve said it a thousand times and I’ll say it a million more times, the savings potential from cost effective measures from current technologies and services is at least 30%. See the McKinsey report from last year as backup for my hypothesis by people who know what they are talking about.
On the other hand, I read that this group is only going to meet twice a year and judging by the agenda of the first meeting it appears they won’t be inflicting too much damage on the citizenry. If this is all they are going to do twice a year maybe this is simply a resume stuffer organization. “Served on the Secretary of Energy’s Energy and Renewable Advisory Committee” would sound impressive for an introduction for a keynote address at Yale University’s spring graduation, especially for graduates with degrees in renewable energy management.
FIFA (Federation International de Football Association) chose Qatar to host the 2022 World Cup tournament. Qatar, a tiny tumor of a country jutting into the Arabian Gulf is about the size of Connecticut, or about twice the size of Long Island (although saying it’s twice as big as anything is misleading). Temperatures during the World Cup there will approach 426F, just below the point of spontaneous combustion of flammable items like paper but fortunately for most World Cup fans, above the melting point of the vuvuzela. I rather like the vuvuzela, at least as comes across on the TV. It’s hilarious like a cloud of June bugs or swarm of mosquitoes amplified a couple hundred fold.
In addition to building nine new stadiums and renovating a couple others, they will be supplying OUTDOOR air conditioning for these stadiums. They will probably need to build a couple thousand MW power plants as well.
South Africa boasted that theirs was the greenest World Cup ever. If Qatar says anything about green, they will have to use Venus as the baseline alternative for measuring the savings realized. If I were them, I would just go with it and say this is the most ridiculous idea of all time. We will proudly burn as much energy as half the countries with teams at the tournament.
I can almost guarantee they will build a photovoltaic plant the size of the country in the Saudi Arabian desert and that’s what we will be hearing about.
Too see how much money people in this region have, do a Google Earth or Maps of Dubai. Apparently there isn’t enough moonscape barren coast on which to build opulent homes, so they make their own islands or “palms” where the strips of land take on the pattern of the veins in a palm leaf I guess. And they have all the huge sky scrapers including the world’s tallest building. What for? By the looks of it, the only people who work there must be those that take care of the people who live there. And why the tall buildings? My impression has always been skyscrapers are needed for land-locked cities like New York and Hong Kong. UAE makes Phoenix look like the Amazon basin. There is nothing there. Just pave it over and sprawl out so there is something to do with your time – like drive your 12 cylinder Italian sports car to the spa, bank, casino and back home. The place is so un-natural it creeps me out.
written by Jeffrey L. Ihnen, P.E., LEED AP